Rebuilding Again vs. Lame Duck Psychopaths – 6 F.J. 267 (June 20, 2014) – Fantasy Baseball Trade Review (J.Ellsbury/A.Gonzalez/C.Hamels)

SUPREME COURT OF FANTASY JUDGMENT

Rebuilding Again vs. Lame Duck Pyschopaths

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI FROM
THE COLLEGE AMIGOS FANTASY BASEBALL LEAGUE

Decided June 20, 2014
Cite as 6 F.J. 267 (June 2014)

Factual Background

A rotisserie fantasy baseball league called the College Amigos Fantasy Baseball League (hereinafter referred to as “CAFBL” was established in 1999 and is hosted on CBS.  The CAFBL is a 14-team mixed AL/NL keeper league utilizing an auction-style draft with a budget of $260.00 for 27 players.  Teams are permitted to maintain up to five (5) players during each off-season with players’ salaries increased by $2.00 multiplied by the number of years they have been kept.  The salary of a player acquired in the draft is his auction price.

As with many rotisserie leagues, the CAFBL uses the standard 5×5 scoring categories to determine the standings and prize money.  For offensive players, the five categories are: (1) batting average; (2) homeruns; (3) runs batted in; (4) runs scored; and (5) stolen bases.  For pitchers, the five categories are: (1) wins; (2) earned run average; (3) WHIP (walks+hits/innings pitched); (4) strikeouts; and (5) saves.  The CAFBL applies a head-to-head format where each category is considered a win.

The CAFBL has a written constitution with rules and guidelines in place regarding trades.  The relevant rules pertaining to trades are as follows:

8.     TRADES

8.3   Trades do not affect the salary or contracts of players.
8.4   Trades may only involve players in the instant trade and may not involve cash, players to be named later, or future considerations.

9.      TRADE REVIEWS

9.1.   Trades shall be referred to a 3rd party reviewer and that decision is final.
9.2   The 3rd party reviewer may consider the contract and salary of players for keeper purposes, but the primary considerations of review shall be preservation of the integrity and overall competitiveness of the current season.

The CAFBL’s commissioner submitted a proposed trade between two league members and seeks an opinion on whether the trade should be approved.

Procedural History

Rebuilding Again traded Adrian Gonzalez (1B-LAD, $28.00 salary in 2014), Cole Hamels (SP-PHI, $11.00 salary in 2014) and James Paxton (SP-SEA, $1.00 salary in 2014) to the Lame Duck Psychopaths in exchange for Jacoby Ellsbury (OF-NYY, $37.00 salary in 2014), Kenley Jansen (RP-LAD, $8.00 salary in 2014) and Hector Rondon (RP-CHC, $5.00 salary in 2014).

Issue Presented

(1)   Should the trade between Rebuilding Again and the Lame Duck Psychopaths be approved?

Decision

The Court has consistently ruled that people who participate in fantasy leagues should be given the freedom to manage their teams according to their own preferences.  Whether success is bred from that individual’s decision-making is purely left to some skill, luck, dedication, and savviness.  See Gangrene Master Yoda vs. Team Dizzle, 4 F.J. 284, 285 (October 2012); 4 Ponies vs. Carson City Cocks, 3 F.J. 13 (May 2011).

When presented with a dispute over the fairness or equitability of a trade, the Court will evaluate the objective merits of a deal and ensure that the integrity of the league is maintained.   Victoria’s Secret vs. C-Train, 2 F.J. 32, 35 (October 2010).  Typically, the approval or rejection of a trade is based on whether the deal was made without collusion, has equitable consideration, and comports with the best interests of the league.  See 4 Ponies vs. Beaver Hunters, 3 F.J. 26, 27 (June 2011).  The virtue of a trade is measured in both quantifiable criteria and subjective needs of the teams involved.  Carson City Cocks vs. Stud Muffins, 3 F.J. 23, 24 (May 2011).

No evidence has been submitted indicating any alleged collusion or malfeasance.  As such, the Court will operate on the presumption that there is no collusive conduct between the parties.

The CAFBL is a keeper league which can lead to a different evaluation of a trade as opposed to a non-keeper or redraft league.  A trade that may look facially uneven or lopsided could easily pass muster in a keeper league.  Trades made between teams in a keeper league need to be analyzed by other factors besides merely comparing statistics.  Grave Diggers vs. Chilidogs, 4 F.J. 5, 8 (January 2012).  These other factors include salary cap flexibility, contractual status of players, and long-term planning at the expense of the current season.  Smittydogs vs. Moneyball, 1 F.J. 32, 33 (June 2010); Winners vs. Seven Shades of Shite, 3 F.J. 97, 102 (July 2011) (holding that team owners in keeper leagues with no hope of contending in the current season must make critical roster management decisions of whether to trade established players to help build for the future).

It should be noted that the CAFBL’s rules specifically state that the validity and equitability of trades shall primarily consider the overall integrity and competitiveness of the current season.  As such, the Court defers to the league’s guidelines for the standard of review.  This means that we will deviate somewhat slightly from the norm and focus on the immediate effect and impact of this trade rather than broaden the scope and break down the long-term benefits typically afforded in keeper league trades.  In Pursuit of the Grail vs. Screaming Psychopaths, 6 F.J. 5 (February 2014).

At first glance, the trade of Adrian Gonzalez, Cole Hamels and James Paxton in exchange for Jacoby Ellsbury, Kenley Jansen and Hector Rondon looks fair and equitable.  None of the players in this deal are considered elite for purposes of requiring additional scrutiny merely because of how valuable they are.  See Steelers vs. Patriots, 3 F.J. 216, 220 (November 2011).

When a trade such as this is consummated involving the exchange of players at different positions, it can reasonably be concluded that both GM’s have different interests and priorities with respect to the composition of their rosters.  See In Pursuit of the Grail vs. Reloading Again, 6 F.J. 12, 13 (March 2014).  GM’s in roto leagues are free to prioritize which categories they want to pursue improvement in when making trades and managing their rosters.  Team Sabo vs. 4 Ponies, 5 F.J. 167 (August 2013) (approving a trade where a team higher in the standings traded Mat Latos for Homer Bailey because he needed improvement in the WHIP category despite Bailey having better statistics with wins, ERA and strikeouts); Joba’s Mustache vs. Obtuse Wardens, 5 F.J. 40, 41 (May 2013); Stud Muffins vs. Cajun Crawdads, 4 F.J. 61, 63 (May 2012).

Despite the fact that these two teams are at opposite ends of the standings, this deal does not appear to be a dump trade or fit into either side of the keeper league trade strategy dichotomy where one team has a “win now” mentality and the other team is conceding the current season in exchange for building towards the future.  Rather, this trade appears to be motivated by satisfying certain particular needs, especially for Rebuilding Again.  The acquisition of Ellsbury is likely geared towards a need for stolen bases and runs scored given what his specialty and propensities are.

In addition, the acquisitions of Jansen and Rondon clearly indicate that Rebuilding Again is looking to ascend the standings in the saves categories.  Both Jansen and Rondon do provide an element of inherent risk given some of their struggles earlier this season.  Jansen, despite having dominant stuff, has not been consistent this year and has a litany of former closers in the Dodgers bullpen who can step in.  Rondon is a young pitcher who ascended to become the Cubs closer after other choices failed.  He has had a reasonable amount of success, but he is inexperienced and will likely have more ups and downs throughout the course of the season.

The package being exchanged for Ellsbury, Jansen and Rondon is more than equitable.  Adrian Gonzalez is having a resurgence this season in terms of his power and provides solid production in batting average as well.  He will not provide the kind of statistics that Ellsbury will in stolen bases and runs scored, so this appears to epitomize how GM’s prioritize where they want to seek improvement.

Cole Hamels can be a legitimate fantasy ace when healthy and receiving run support with a good bullpen.  After starting the year on the disabled list, it took a few starts for Hamels to regain his form.  Now he is pitching as well as he ever has in the midst of an extended scoreless streak.  However, he will likely not accumulate as many wins as he might have had the Phillies been a better team.  The fact remains that he is an above-average fantasy starting pitcher and someone that can be relied upon by the Lame Duck Psychopaths this season and beyond.  In addition to Hamels, James Paxton is a talented young pitcher who got off to a great start in 2014 with two wins and a 2.25 ERA through two starts before suffering a lat injury which will likely keep him sidelined until at least the All Star break.

This deal makes sense from both teams’ perspectives.  See Los Pollos Hermanos vs. Little Stumps, 3 F.J. 192, 195 (October 2011) (holding that a trade will be rejected when the Court cannot objectively ascertain any benefit to one of the teams and the net result in no way makes a team better now or in the future).  Both teams filled their respective needs by exchanging players with equitable value.  Based on the foregoing, the Court approves the trade between Rebuilding Again and the Lame Duck Psychopaths.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmailby feather